From the LA Times:
One U.S. official in Washington said the administration now believes Iraq needs a "negotiated resolution … a scaled-back democratic process."As Rafe at rc3 says of the new plan: That may be the right answer, but they really shouldn't have teased the Iraqis with the idea that they'd get to choose their own leaders for all these months. Sigh.
Between the two conflicting key goals, "I see the arguments for stability now outweighing the calls for democracy," said the official, who declined to be identified. The formation of a unified slate would further entrench the U.S.-allied parties, which are mostly led by longtime exiles with dubious popular support and are still viewed with suspicion by many Iraqi citizens.
No comments:
Post a Comment