The Wall Street Journal vs. The Scientific Consensus
While we resist commenting on policy matters (e.g. the relative merits of the Kyoto Protocol or the various bills before the US Senate), we will staunchly defend the science against distortions and misrepresentations, be they intentional or not. In this spirit, we respond here to the scientifically inaccurate or incorrect assertions made in the editorial.Heh -- it's several screens worth, and includes 17 rebutted excerpts. Yeowch!
(via rc3.org)
No comments:
Post a Comment