Barack Obama voted against the confirmation of Justice Roberts, but he
advises against the harsh assaults that have been made (from the left) against the Democrats who voted
for the nominee (and he generalizes this advice to other controversies as well).
Russ Feingold, the only Democrat to vote not only against war in Iraq but also against the Patriot Act, doesn't become complicit in the erosion of civil liberties simply because he chooses to abide by a deeply held and legitimate view that a President, having won a popular election, is entitled to some benefit of the doubt when it comes to judicial appointments. Like it or not, that view has pretty strong support in the Constitution's design.
He makes good points, and speaks with typical eloquence and rationality. It puts "big tent" arguments into a valuable perspective.
... to the degree that we brook no dissent within the Democratic Party, and demand fealty to the one, "true" progressive vision for the country, we risk the very thoughtfulness and openness to new ideas that are required to move this country forward. When we lash out at those who share our fundamental values because they have not met the criteria of every single item on our progressive "checklist," then we are essentially preventing them from thinking in new ways about problems. We are tying them up in a straightjacket and forcing them into a conversation only with the converted.
. . .
Our goal should be to stick to our guns on those core values that make this country great, show a spirit of flexibility and sustained attention that can achieve those goals, and try to create the sort of serious, adult, consensus around our problems that can admit Democrats, Republicans and Independents of good will. This is more than just a matter of "framing," although clarity of language, thought, and heart are required. It's a matter of actually having faith in the American people's ability to hear a real and authentic debate about the issues that matter.
Read the
whole thing, really.
2 comments:
RenaRF wrote a powerful rebuttal to Obama's piece:
http://www2.boomantribune.com/?op=displaystory;sid=2005/9/30/162027/128
Medley
http://uncorked.org/medley/
another argument here:
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2005/10/2/162223/850
Post a Comment