The right in our country likes to say that anybody who disagrees with them is supporting our enemies in fact or spirit. But it's hard not to see the right-wing crazies (especially the rabid religious right) as having much more in common with the world-view and aspirations of Islamic fundamentalists than with those of our Founding Fathers. Kos has had a
couple of
posts on this theme, with additions from commenters, coming up with a laundry list of parallels between the American Taliban and their mideast counterparts. Just a couple examples:
Foreign Policy
- Al Qaida/Taliban: World domination - do it our way or we attack
- American Taliban: World domination - do it our way or we attack
- Liberals: Peace and international cooperation
Executing Minors
- Al Qaida/Taliban: Executing Minors OK
- American Taliban: Executing Minors OK
- Liberals: Find this to be a barbaric and embarrassing practice
Free Speech
- Al Qaida/Taliban: Anyone who disagrees with us is an infidel and must be silenced
- American Taliban: Anyone who disagrees with us is a traitor and must be silenced
- Liberals: Anyone who disagrees with us is in for a spirited discussion
I have to agree with his take on the whole thing (the parallels and the pointless namecalling):
The reasons we hate the American Taliban are the same reasons we hate fundamentalists of all stripes -- they seek to impose their own moral code on the rest of society, and do so with the zeal and moral absolutism possible only from those who believe they are doing "God's work".
Let's stop looking for the right kind of loyalty, and instead try to look at how we can all live and let live, at least a
little. Don't we have consitutional principles and secular political philosophy for just that reason?
Sigh.
No comments:
Post a Comment