Quote of the day (forward-looking edition)

Measure your health by your sympathy with morning and spring. If there is no response in you to the awakening of nature,—if the prospect of an early morning walk does not banish sleep, if the warble of the first bluebird does not thrill you,—know that the morning and the spring of your life are past. Thus may you feel your pulse.

Henry David Thoreau
Journal entry, February 25, 1859

(via the Thoreau blog)

Typical

It's just what we've come to expect from our leaders: when a scandal of neglect is revealed, their response is to punish the whistle-blowers and cut off media access. But all with the best interests of our troops at heart, of course...

(via Talking Points Memo)

Wednesday shrapnel

It's kind of a mixed bag of bits today, some that make you glad, others that make you want to bang your head against the wall. Typical of recent days...

Good news:

A federal court has ruled that bloggers cannot be held liable for the contents of comments left on their posts -- seems like a no-brainer to me, but it involves defining the two authors as separate "content providers" and working from there...

Bad news:

Not only is the Internet addicting, but it can kill you. eesh...
(via dailyKos)

Worse news:

Trying to get dental care through Medicaid is so difficult, that at least one boy died for lack of a pulled tooth. Note too that his original care would have cost $80, while the surgeries and emergency care after it was too late came closer to $250,000...
(via XOverboard = Some Guy with a Website)

Intriguing:

Just realizing that you're getting exercise can help you lose weight. Score another one for the power of positive thinking...
(via Rebecca's Pocket)

Depressing:

Apparently unsatisfied with indefinite detentions of prisoners in remote facilities, we're now keeping a group of immigrants (many legal) in long-term confinement that, among other things, is leaving their children unschooled and/or without their families, and many families chronically undernourished. What are we becoming?!
(via Medley)

Potentially surprising:

Contrary to what conservative fear-mongers would have you believe, immigrants are statistically more law-abiding than those born here, and their presence actually raises local wages.

More of the same:

In the rush to support Bush's "surge," we're sending troops to Iraq without specialized desert training that was previously considered key to their success. As kos says, another blow to the "support the troops" refrain...

I always suspected

Get Your Monster Name

(via Medley, the Malevolant Evil Demon from the Legendary Enchanted Yonder)

I had my cake, but now she won't let me eat it!

A subset of men seem to think that feminism is to be blamed for all the ills of modern life, most explicitly the challenges to their own sense of worth and power. Amanda picks up a typical example (I was going to say "particularly egregious," but then I thought again) in which a guy is utterly emasculated when his wife's salary begins to exceed his own.

Money is a cold arbiter of power, and when a wife starts making more, both spouses may feel that the husband has somehow been demoted.

Rather than blame feminism for "warping" women's priorities away from feathering the nest into self-actualization, perhaps such gents should focus their ire on the patriarchal structure of our society, which provides men (as well as women) with such a narrow definition of worth that they are left "strangely fragile" in the face of the need for change and communication. As one commenter in this thread put it:

There needs to be some movement to support men in reclaiming their identity from belittling, dehumanizing stereotypes like this.

OH wait there is, they call it feminism.

Indeed, feminism isn't about women hating on the menfolks; it's about breaking out of the rigid structures that our parents (and teachers and peers and media and...) have inflicted upon us, and deciding for ourselves what our aptitudes, interests, and general contributions to our families and to society should be. That the answer could be different for every individual (or couple, or family, or...) should be a source of joy, not terror!

(via Medley)

This rings obvious to me

It's never seemed right to me that "all carbs are bad" or "all fat must be avoided" or any of the extremes touted in various waves, not only because they are extreme (balanced diet, anyone?) but because it seems so unlikely that all body chemistries are the same and will respond the same to a range of foods. Never had anything spicey? it might give you indigestion, but leave your Indian neighbor feeling calm and happy. Those who've grown up on vegetarian diets often find the meat and dairy-heavy American diet takes a long time to adjust to, as the necessary enzymes come "on-line." When my g.i. tract acts up, it's a bowl of cereal that is the only guaranteed gentle meal, while others would claim themselves bloated or unhappy after the same. Neither of us are "wrong," just dealing with different chemistries and adaptations.

Anyway, all that was by way of introduction to a new Scientific American review of a new book that indicates that we actually absorb nutrients better from foods with which we are familiar and that we enjoy. Whether that's a side-effect of a happy mood or of the chemistry we've built up by prior exposure to those foods, it's evidence that we're just not all the same and should stop assuming that one-size-fits-all recommendations are reasonable.

(via Rebecca's Pocket)

Amazing if true

Not sure why this isn't getting more coverage on our side of the pond, but it's a pretty substantial development:

"There are four or five generals and admirals we know of who would resign if Bush ordered an attack on Iran," a source with close ties to British intelligence said. "There is simply no stomach for it in the Pentagon, and a lot of people question whether such an attack would be effective or even possible."

There is a strain of military mores calling for resisting an unjust command. Guys who actually manage troops know what these ridiculous Bush ego trips are costing in actual human suffering...

Fun with graphics

Wow, Indexed is a blog that's made up of little graphs and venn diagrams done on index cards, some showing deep truths (see here or here) and others random silliness (try this or this). Brilliant. I'll have to visit again (as well as mining the archives).

And yes, it reminded me of the classic Cartoons Drawn on the Back of Business Cards as well.

(via Hugo Schwyzer, in a round-about way)

Update: heh, here's another good one... (ok, I'll leave you to surf for yourselves now)

Friday cat blogging, nostalgia edition

Looking back through all my old posts (for keyword purposes) triggered a wave of nostalgia, so it seemed appropriate to mine the kitten files for photos. Here are two of Pixel at around three months (so long ago!) looking cute and groggy in the spotlight in our family room...


A great portrait by my father-in-law, with hints of the regal disdain to come...


Between games, lots of sleep.
(She was so dead to the world that we called her "the cutlet"...)


Previous Pixel blogging (in reverse order of appearance): 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, doh!, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, arrival, teaser, homepage

Tiny, tiny steps

Take your victories where you can: Wimbledon will equalize prizes for men and women (after years of advocacy from Billie Jean King and more recently by Venus Williams). Apparently they were the last of the Grand Slams to recognize that the women's game has been as much, if not more, of a draw as the men's in recent years and deserves equal compensation.

There's still plenty of work to be done in other arenas, but let's celebrate those blows for sanity where we can.

(via Bitch, Ph.D.)

Belated silliness

That is, I got Monday off and didn't leave you with any amusements for the long weekend. It's too late for diversions now, but here are two of the funniest things I've encountered over the last year or so:

• The ultimate mock pie-chart, an instant classic. (I won't spoil your fun by giving the title.)
  (via boing boing)
  
  
• Order of the Science Scouts of Exemplary Repute and Above-Average Physique. An inspired tribute to the arcane wisdoms and nerdy joys of a life of science. My favorite of their many merit badges is "I work with way too much radioactivity, and yet still no discernable superpowers yet" heh.
  (via kottke)

By the grim light of day...

We've clearly overstayed our welcome in Iraq, but Mithras goes further:

If you're still alive in Iraq, you realize that the Americans are going to leave, sooner or later. So, you focus on your ultimate opponents - other Iraqis, usually - and use the Americans as a shield or a sword or you ignore them, whichever makes sense in light of your aims.

Seems about right. What are we achieving with that surge again? Can we go home now??

What's on your "permanent record"

Katha Pollitt visits TPMcafe to offer her thoughts on the recent Edwards blogger scandal, which boil down basically to the thought that "mainstream America" isn't really ready for the rough-and-tumble norms of the blogging world:

The man is running for president, not king of the blogosphere, and he's running now, not in some putative future when words like "christofascist" and "fuck" have lost their punch.
...
It's all very well to dismiss as outmoded people who respond poorly to obscenities and dirty jokes about religion. Fact is, there are a lot of them. A candidate would be out of his mind to alienate them over a staffing matter.

It's hard to disagree. I've had similar discussions with my mother and others (see, e.g., here), who are sufficiently jolted by certain types of phrasing that they become unable to hear the larger arguments getting made. Further, the heat of even shared frustration can dissipate with time, making excerpts appear even more damaging in hindsight. I myself am pretty comfortable with a wide range of snark, parody, swearing, and other forms of mixing personality with intellectual arguments, but it will be a long time before there majority of the country shares that familiarity.

I was also interested in Rafe's response to this same series of events, which looks at the Marcotte experience and Dooce's long-ago blog-related firing (see, e.g., here) and sees a lesson for the ages: be careful about what you share with the public, for it may come back to haunt you.

I think this is really the bottom line, and it's true regardless of your field of endeavor. Political bloggers are in the spotlight now, but unless you are anonymous, what you blog about will affect your career. If you write ugly things about Microsoft, you probably shouldn't expect to later be hired by Microsoft, or people who like Microsoft, or people who dislike people who write ugly things. Yes, your blog can raise your level of visibility and present you with new opportunities, but it can also foreclose opportunities that might otherwise have been available.

Among other things, he notes that many employers now Google job applicants. (Heck, I once was Googled by a blind date, to disconcerting effect.) You may not mind those linkages right now, but will you feel as cavallier about your bloviation when you're applying for executive positions or running for political office? Eventually people's attitudes about such things may change -- either tolerance for tough language might increase, or people might learn to be more forgiving of adolescent websites abandoned long ago -- but that could take a mighty long time. It might be best to keep in mind that even if you're writing for your friends, the record you leave behind could be revisited by anybody...

Quote of the day -- political edition

The only sure bulwark of continuing liberty is a government strong enough to protect the interests of the people, and a people strong enough and well enough informed to maintain its sovereign control over the goverment.

- Franklin D. Roosevelt

(via digby)

Roberts and the Supremes

A flip title to introduce two interesting stories about what's going on at the Supreme Court. One more intriguing, the other more grim, from my point of view:

1. Howard Bashman reports that Chief Justice Roberts is attempting to get more unified rulings in more cases, rather than the close counts and/or flurry of dissents and concurrences that leave lawyers scratching their heads over how to proceed. Roberts says, among other things,

   The whole notion that it's functioning as a Court doesn't seem to appeal to anyone ... I think it's bad, long-term, if people identify the rule of law with how individual justices vote.

   Bashman notes that achieving greater consensus is easier in theory than in practice (noting some of Roberts' own minority positions).
   
   
2. The L.A. Times speculates that Justice Scalia may emerge as the leader of a new conservative majority in some of the major cases this year. If he writes the majority opinions in some of the hot issues coming before the court in the near future, he could leave his black-and-white thinking to guide development of some whole swaths of social issues.

   Even when in the majority, Scalia has written relatively few major opinions for the court. Rehnquist, during his tenure as chief justice from 1986 to 2005, rarely turned to Scalia, because doing so risked losing the crucial votes of moderates, in particular O'Connor and Kennedy.

   His popularity hasn't increased, I don't think, but the substitution of Alito and Roberts for O'Connor and Rehnquist means that there may be more ideological allies for Scalia's conservative views on more cases to come. Only time will tell how that will play out.

(via How Appealing)

Today's schadenfreude

In retrospect it seems almost inevitable, in today's Through the Looking-glass world, that after years of accusing Democrats of "supporting terrorists" by questioning Administration policy, it turns out that the Republicans have been benefitting from likely terrorist supporters of the real (financial) kind . . .

Anything to make a buck!

Quote of the day

Silent gratitude isn't much use to anyone.

- Gladys Browyn Stern,
writer (1890-1973)

[The same might be said of unvoiced admiration, or unexpressed love...]

(via A.W.A.D.)

Chinese New Year

We're a couple days into the Year of the Pig, in honor of which Cute Overload offers an appropriate deluge of piglet adorability. Tis the season!!
.

Shamelessley lifted from Atrios

One of the infinite absurdities surrounding the recent "SCARY WEAPONS FROM IRAN" was assertions like this one from Tony Snow:

You cannot deny that these weapons exist. You cannot deny that there is presently no manufacturing capability within Iraq able to produce those kinds of weapons.

It wasn't long ago that Iraq was an existential threat to the United States, and now they can't even manage to produce relatively simple weapons.

Except, of course, they can.

Friday cats -- some spotted, some not

I've been accused of disguising the fact that our household holds *4* cats and not 2, by showing pictures only of the bengals. I can only anwer by noting the difficulty in capturing a picture of a black cat (like our two non-bengals) that looks like anything other than a black blob. Anyway, we do get a decent one occasionally, including this one that pairs Pixel (right) with onetime Master of the Household, Yogi (left).


You're blocking my heatlamp!


Prior evidence of additonal cats:
foursome, playtime!, three-fer, catnip!, Pixel and Yogi, and of course my cats page (where the "blobs" have been Photoshopped lighter until some features emerged)
Update: here's another one -- a solo appearance by a black cat, no less!